姚鸣
发表于9分钟前
回复
:赫梅(Benoît Poelvoorde 饰)在巴黎从事画作修补的工作,最近他觉察到妻子的状态反常,然而当他真的与情敌面对面的时候,懦弱的性格却让他退出了竞争。同时在另一个时空中,蛮荒之地的一群奴隶在食人魔左坦与众仆从的强迫献祭下苦不堪言,他们唯一的希望,是预言中的救世主降临,把他们从左坦手中解放。赫梅在他波折不断的生活中频频乱入另一世界,并开始顺应奴隶们的希望,带领他们反抗左坦。借助在现实世界中苦学《君主论》《三十六计》得到的理论知识,赫梅带领奴隶大军击退左坦的仆从,并建立了自己的独裁王国,一座富丽堂皇的城市在山谷间拔地而起,赫梅的气质也发生了一百八十度的转变。不久奴隶们难耐艰苦的工作开始怀念昔日时光,赫梅的地位发生动摇并选择回到现实世界解决自己真正的问题。
伍思凯
发表于8分钟前
回复
:Publicist Alyssa Banks thinks she's in a fairytale when she meets a British prince who whisks her away to Europe. However, Alyssa's dream quickly turns into a nightmare when the volatile prince refuses to let her leave his family's estate.
沈雁
发表于8分钟前
回复
:A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.- JohnHowardReid, imdb