恰克与飞鸟
发表于9分钟前
回复
:沙展刘检获一辑淫照交予上司姜警司后不久,即遭冷面杀手大虎所杀,多年拍档阿Pitt誓要替老友复仇,追赶原凶,于是逐一线索查探,张于发现面档肥老鹅是唯一的目击证人,邀得他的帮助,于是顺利将大虎拘捕,可惜他随即被金律师担保外出。大虎为向肥鹅报复,派人向其家掷燃烧弹;使他变得无家可归。于是Pitt邀他回家暂住。Pitt姐Angel乃新闻记者,为套取第一手资料,经常向肥鹅索料,闹出不少笑料,二人更设下“非礼计划”,借故在公众地方将大虎痛殴一顿,以泄心头愤。 大虎其后设陷阱引肥鹅与 Pitt,欲将之干掉,幸得小美相助才得以脱险。小美原来是黑市居民,被诱骗来港,又被金律师迫为娼妓。在小美帮助下, Pitt与肥鹅取得架步内的一辑淫照,并发现姜警司原来有份参与,于是向姜警司大兴问罪。谁知姜警司已将Angel、小美等捉去作人质,迫他们二人交出淫照。当然最后是邪不能胜正的。
金在中
发表于9分钟前
回复
:A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.- JohnHowardReid, imdb