李易珊
发表于7分钟前
回复
:阿道夫(奎姆·古铁雷兹 Quim Gutiérrez 饰)已经30岁了,却还是一介小小的保安,因为职业上丝毫看不到任何的未来,阿道夫本身是一个好逸恶劳的懒鬼,最终,阿道夫的女友选择了离开他。一天,阿道夫受到了刚刚越狱的黑帮老大瓦兹奎兹(卡洛斯·阿雷塞斯 Carlos Areces 饰)的袭击,这场意外的袭击让阿道夫终于知道了父亲阿纳克莱托(伊马诺尔·阿里亚斯 Imanol Arias 饰)隐藏多年的秘密。原来,阿纳克莱托表面上是一名农场主,实际上曾是将瓦兹奎兹捉拿归案的秘密特工。如今瓦兹奎兹重获自由,他的第一件事情就是要来找阿纳克莱托报仇。为了保命,阿道夫不得不和阿纳克莱托合作,他所要面对的除了穷凶极恶的罪犯外,还有和父亲之间糟糕的亲子关系。
李赫焌
发表于6分钟前
回复
:A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.- JohnHowardReid, imdb