韩一磊
发表于3分钟前
回复
:阿沾(黄霑)是靠老婆(沈殿霞)发家的某家公司的总经理,他虽然非常怕老婆,却时刻琢磨着背着她偷点腥。看上风情万种的贫女阿凤(李美凤)后,阿沾以高薪诱惑她,双方讲好一夜情人之后阿凤进入阿沾公司做高级公关,不想紧要关头阿沾老婆打来一通电话,沮丧的阿沾要阿凤先去公司做事,以后再找机会行欢。阿凤刚入公司便招来一帮男同事大献殷勤,王小强(钟镇涛)虽也对她爱慕不已,却由于性格木讷老实,学不来同事们的那一手。阿沾几次借工作之便想与阿凤发生关系,都被老婆无意间破坏,王小强也无心插柳有了许多次与阿凤单独相处的机会,两人情感渐渐升温。阿凤在与王小强柔情蜜意之时听闻他最憎拿身体换取钱和利的女人时,心头一紧,而阿沾从没放松对阿凤肉体的追求。
陈冠蒲
发表于5分钟前
回复
:A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.- JohnHowardReid, imdb