基亚Milan. On the night before his retirement after 35 years without having fired a shot, Lieutenant Amore sees his world turned upside down. But maybe it is the world around him that has changed. A thriller poised perilously between law and criminality.
申承勋
回复 :A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.- JohnHowardReid, imdb
钮大可
回复 :香港曾以滿街霓虹燈聞名世界，卻隨著時代變遷，昔日的燦爛繁華似乎已成往事。妻子難以接受丈夫離世，終日在家整理其遺物。身邊所有人都叫她別再執著，卻屢勸無效。一日，她發現一條開啟亡夫的秘密霓虹燈工場的鎖匙，並在那裡遇見他的青年徒弟，得悉亡夫一直希望重造一個已拆除的神秘霓虹燈牌。盼能完成其遺願的妻子，在過程中逐漸了解每個昔日燈牌的故事。張艾嘉、任達華相隔39年後再度再合作，攜手新演員周漢寧、蔡思韵，講述一段屬於香港的獨特歷史。片中的霓虹燈與最近的清拆工程不謀而合。不同的意境符號貫穿全片，暗喻著這座城市之餘，也對照著力挽狂瀾的香港人，正如導演所言：雖然是空執著，然而，人生也許要有執著才有重量。
唐韵笙
回复 :12个满怀梦想的年轻人考入了美国芭蕾舞学院，一场关于青春与激情的“人生舞蹈剧”上演了。由于年终将有6人能有机会进入美国国家芭蕾舞剧团，年轻人都开始了精心准备决定他们的前途的那一场年终表演。舞蹈执导乔纳森（彼得•盖勒 Peter Gallagher 饰）和芭蕾舞演员库珀 （Ethan Stiefel 饰）因成为情敌而针锋相对，他们年终将各自执导一部芭蕾舞剧而令到气氛愈加紧张。乔纳森选中了优秀的莫瑞安（苏珊•梅•普拉特 Susan May Pratt 饰）和极具天赋的爱娃（佐伊•桑塔纳 Zoe Saldana 饰），他要将一出经典的芭蕾舞剧完美无暇的进行诠释；而库珀则选中了不够完美的朱迪（阿曼达•舒尔Amanda Schull 饰），他决定要上演一出完全颠覆全统的芭蕾舞剧。经典与颠覆之战将最终决定这3个女孩的归宿！
