王晶卫（黄子华 饰）是个九十年代前卫的香港导演，并木但十分轻视六十年代的粤语片。没想到他穿越时空回到了六十年代，并木他被大导演楚原告知，只要能在六十年代里拍一部受欢迎的电影便能回去。王晶卫虽然十分无奈，也认识了还没有成名时的李奇（罗嘉良 饰）和谢源（吴镇宇 饰）这对难兄难弟。由于王晶卫的特殊身份，便带领两人一举成名。李奇与谢源的各自的女友宝珠（张可颐 饰）与芳芳（舒淇 饰）都移情别恋钟情于王晶卫，十分倾慕他的才华。李奇与谢源得知情况后，与王晶为断绝了来往。而王晶卫所拍的电影，完全没有人欣赏，到底他又能否回到属于自己的时空呢？
郑绪岚
回复 :山田篤宏执导并担任编剧、吉沢亮主演的[觉醒](AWAKE，暂译)发布剧照，影片讲述吉沢亮扮演的棋手荣一，在被天才棋手重创后退出职业圈，心灰意冷的荣一与几个朋友组成研究会，利用电脑AI与昔日的对手进行复赛对战，后为了激励与自己当年境遇相似的棋手，荣一选择重回台前。导演山田篤宏表示：吉沢亮为了扮演这个角色，自我增肥、驼背、连走路姿势都进行了设计，以至他在片场对吉沢亮说：“看到现在的你，我都忘记了之前你有多酷。”本片将于2020年12月25日登陆日本院线。
何勇
回复 :Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
孙立群
回复 :对约翰·米汉的前女友、前妻、警察侦探的进行了详细采访，描述了其长达数十年的令人毛骨悚然的犯罪生涯
